2012/12/21 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Marko Tiikkaja <pgm...@joh.to> writes: >> Another idea would be to force the STRICT to be immediately after >> INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE. > > What about before it, ie > > STRICT UPDATE ... > > This should dodge the problem of possible conflict with table names, > and it seems to me to read more naturally too.
+1 Pavel > > regards, tom lane > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
