On 12/21/12 5:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Marko Tiikkaja <pgm...@joh.to> writes:
Another idea would be to force the STRICT to be immediately after
INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE.
What about before it, ie
STRICT UPDATE ...
This should dodge the problem of possible conflict with table names,
and it seems to me to read more naturally too.
Yeah, putting STRICT after the command wouldn't work for UPDATE.
I like this one best so far, so I'm going with this syntax for the next
version of the patch.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
