Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 11:03 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I think this (have a config option, and have SIGHUP work as expected) > > would be useful to demo in worker_spi, if you care to submit a patch. > > Yeah, I would love too. Reading the code of worker_spi, we could add one > or three parameters: a naptime, and the schemaname for both bgprocess. > One would be enough or do you prefer all three? I got no problem with three. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
