On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 12:54 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 11:03 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > > I think this (have a config option, and have SIGHUP work as expected) > > > would be useful to demo in worker_spi, if you care to submit a patch. > > > > Yeah, I would love too. Reading the code of worker_spi, we could add one > > or three parameters: a naptime, and the schemaname for both bgprocess. > > One would be enough or do you prefer all three? > > I got no problem with three. >
OK, will do on wednesday. Thanks. -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
