Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > I took a quick look at this and am just curious why we're adding the > requirement that t_tableOid has to be initialized?
I assume he meant it had been left at a random value, which is surely bad practice even if a specific usage doesn't fall over today. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers