On Jan 19, 2013 10:55 AM, "Jon Erdman" <postgre...@thewickedtribe.net> wrote: > > > I did realize that since I moved it to + the doc should change, but I didn't address that. I'll get on it this weekend. > > As far as the column name and displayed values go, they're taken from the CREATE FUNCTION syntax, and were recommended by Magnus, Bruce, and Fetter, who were all sitting next to me day after pgconf.eu Prague. I personally have no strong feelings either way, I just want to be able to see the info without having to directly query pg_proc. Whatever you all agree on is fine by me.
Sounds like you have a +4/-1 on the names then. I'd keep them as is.
