On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 09:33:58AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Dimitri Fontaine >> <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: >> > Thanks for commiting the fixes. About the regression tests, I think >> > you're right, but then I can't see how to include such a test. Maybe you >> > could add the other one, though? >> >> Can you point me specifically at what you have in mind so I can make >> sure I'm considering the right thing? >> >> > +1 for this version, thanks. >> >> OK, committed that also. > > Also, I assume we no longer want after triggers on system tables, so I > removed that from the TODO list and added event triggers as a completed > item.
Seems reasonable. Event triggers are not completed in the sense that there is a lot more stuff we can do with this architecture, but we've got a basic implementation now and that's progress. And they do address the use case that triggers on system tables would have targeted, I think, but better. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
