On 25 January 2013 17:19, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > We > could easily run across a system where pg_class order happens to be > better than anything else we come up with.
I think you should read that back to yourself and see if you still feel the word "easily" applies here. I agree with Tom that its hard for almost any prioritisation not to be better than we have now. But also, we should keep it fairly simple to avoid introducing new behaviour that defeats people with a highly tuned vacuum config. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
