On 27 January 2013 17:11, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 25 January 2013 17:19, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> We >>> could easily run across a system where pg_class order happens to be >>> better than anything else we come up with. >> >> I think you should read that back to yourself and see if you still >> feel the word "easily" applies here. > > I absolutely do.
> You will not convince me that whacking around the > behavior of autovacuum in a maintenance release is a remotely sane > thing to do. This is a different argument. It would be better to say this than to come up with implausible problems as a way of rejecting something. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
