Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 01/30/2013 11:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> FWIW, I'd vote for not enabling that by default --- it's basically an
>>>> unwarranted assumption about how wide people's terminal windows are.
> Well, we could actually set the wrap value to 0, which would mean always
> wrap. That wouldn't be making any assumption about the user's terminal
> window size ;-)
I could live with that. I rather wonder actually if WRAP_COLUMN_DEFAULT
shouldn't be removed in favor of using 0 as the default. 80-column
windows may be our coding standard for Postgres, but that doesn't mean
they're not pretty passe elsewhere.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
