Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 6 February 2013 14:38, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Yeah, I am doing this right now and the "shared" name doesn't seem so
>> good. "libpgframework" sounds decent. So since libpgport comes from
>> src/port, are we okay with src/framework and src/include/framework?
> "common" ?
> src/backend/common
> src/include/common
To me the term "framework" carries a lot of baggage that doesn't fit
this usage. "common" seems better.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
