On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: >> David, >>> However, I am not so keen on the function names. They all start with >>> json_! This mostly feels redundant to me, since the types of the >>> parameters are part of the function signature. > >> I have no opinion about starting the function names with json_ or not. > > +1 for removing that where possible. We generally have avoided such > names at SQL level. (The C-level function names need such prefixes to > be unique, but the SQL names don't.) > > In the cases where one or more arguments are anyelement, however, we may > need to be more specific to avoid ambiguity problems in future. I agree > with Josh's objections to record(), row() etc. to_record() and > to_recordset() might be OK.
! merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
