On Feb 16, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
> To answer David's point, there is no point in having both > > get(json,text) > get(json, variadic text[]) > > since the second can encompass the first, and having both would make calls > ambiguous. Oh. Well then how about get(json, int) get(json, text) get(json, text[]) ? David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
