2013/2/19 Petr Jelinek <pjmo...@pjmodos.net>: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers- >> ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Robert Haas >> Sent: 19 February 2013 15:05 >> To: Merlin Moncure >> Cc: David E. Wheeler; PostgreSQL-development Hackers >> > The argument for removing json_ prefix is that when function behaviors >> > are unambiguously controlled by the arguments, decorating the function >> > name to match the input argument is unnecessary verbosity. >> >> I've come to value greppability of source code pretty highly. I think > that >> some of the points you raise are valid, but in my (minority) opinion >> overloading creates more problems than it solves. You're not going to >> convince me that get() is *ever* a good name for a function - you might as >> well call it thing() or foo() for all the useful information that name > conveys. > > Let me join the minority here, +1
me too +1 Pavel > > Regards > Petr Jelinek > > > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
