On 2/28/13 3:34 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > It's > possible to vastly reduce the size of the scanner output, and > therefore of gram.c, by running flex with -Cf rather than -CF, which > changes the table representation completely. I assume there is a > sound performance reason why we don't do this, but it might be worth > checking that if we haven't lately. When compiled with -Cf, the size > of gram.o drops from 1019260 bytes to 703600, which is a large > savings.
The option choice is based on the recommendation in the flex manual. It wouldn't hurt to re-test it. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
