Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> writes:
> Regarding yytransition I think the problem is we're using flex to
> implement keyword recognition which is usually not what it's used for.
> Usually people use flex to handle syntax things like quoting and
> numeric formats. All identifiers are handled by flex as equivalent.
> Then the last step in the scanner for identifiers is to look up the
> identifier in a hash table and return the keyword token if it's a
> keyword. That would massively simplify the scanner tables.
Uh ... no. I haven't looked into why the flex tables are so large,
but this theory is just wrong. See ScanKeywordLookup().
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
