On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 03:05:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> On my old HPUX box:
>
> $ ./pg_test_fsync
> 2 seconds per test
> Direct I/O is not supported on this platform.
>
> Compare file sync methods using one 8kB write:
> (in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync
> is Linux's default)
> open_datasync 165.122 ops/sec ( 6056
> microsecs/op)
> fdatasync Alarm call
> $ echo $?
> 142 -- that's SIGALRM
>
> The reason it's failing is that according to the traditional (not BSD)
> definition of signal(2), the signal handler is reset to SIG_DFL when the
> signal is delivered. So the second occurrence of SIGALRM doesn't call
> the signal handler but just crashes the process.
>
> The quick-and-dirty fix for this is to just copy pqsignal() into
> pg_test_fsync, and use that instead of calling signal() directly.
> I wonder though if we shouldn't move that function into libpgport.
> Thoughts?
Well, the Win32 signal handler is already in port, so moving the Unix
one seems to make sense, i.e. the comment above pgsignal says:
/* Win32 signal handling is in backend/port/win32/signal.c */
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
