Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 03:05:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> The quick-and-dirty fix for this is to just copy pqsignal() into >> pg_test_fsync, and use that instead of calling signal() directly. >> I wonder though if we shouldn't move that function into libpgport. >> Thoughts?
> Well, the Win32 signal handler is already in port, so moving the Unix > one seems to make sense, i.e. the comment above pgsignal says: > /* Win32 signal handling is in backend/port/win32/signal.c */ Done, though it was a bit more painful than I expected --- I seem to have guessed completely wrong about where the portability hazards were. Good thing we have a buildfarm. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers