Duh. Apologies. That's what happens when you make that 1 last change.

Please find an updated patch.

--
Robins Tharakan


On 19 March 2013 04:07, Josh Kupershmidt <schmi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Robins Tharakan <thara...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please find an updated patch (reworked on the names of SEQUENCES / ROLES
> /
> > SCHEMA etc.)
> > Takes code-coverage of 'make check' for SEQUENCE to ~95%.
>
> There is a typo difference between sequence.out and sequence.sql
> causing the test to fail:
>
> +-- Should fail since seq5 shouldn't exist
> ...
> +-- Should fail since seq5 shouldn't exit
>
> Josh
>

Attachment: regress_sequence_v3.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to