On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > In fact, I'm going to go further and say that I do not like the entire > concept of scannability, either as to design or implementation, and > I think we should just plain rip it out.
This has been my feeling from the beginning, so I'm happy to support this position. I think the current version - where scan-ability is tracked in just one way - is an improvement over the previous version of the patch - where it was tracked in two different ways with a confusing shuffle of information from one place to the other. But my favorite number of places to track it would be zero. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
