Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 12:28:01PM +0200, Nicolas Barbier wrote:
>> +1. Having unlogged matviews without having incremental updates >> yet, isn't super useful anyway. > > I would have surmised the opposite Hmm. I was thinking about the fact that a full refresh can be unlogged anyway, but that's only true if you're not using WAL for replication. If you need a matview on the master but not on the replica(s), then there is still benefit to declaring it to be unlogged in the absence of incremental maintenance. -- Kevin Grittner EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
