Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > We are definitely more organized for this beta because we are picking > > the hour for beta start. ;-) > > > > The issue is that we can't just close beta and roll out a beta1 tarball. > > There will be patch questions, doc questions, and general build > > questions that could take days to resolve before we are 100% ready for > > beta1. > > > > Now, if you just want to roll together what we have and send out that, > > that is fine, but there are going to be significant cleanups in beta2. > > This is what I'm figuring ... if we roll and send out a beta1 right off, > more ppl will look at it and report bugs then if we just say 'hey, its > frozen, check it out' ... as I've said before, to me, beta is "we're > getting ready to release, let us know what is wrong so that we can fix it" > ... its at the RC level that we're saying we believe we have all the > issues worked out ...
Yes, I am just concerned we may actually adjust functionality after beta1 if we haven't tied everything down, and that may be a problem. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
