On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > So my take is that anything that needs initdb doesn't get in after > beta1, unless it's a "must fix" bug. What have we got in the queue > that would require system catalog changes?
Agreed, but, have we ever done such when it *wasn't* required? I know in the past its always been with hestitation that such has been done, or at least that is how I've felt it come across ... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
