On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 06:23:07PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 05.05.2013 18:51, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > >On 05/05/2013 01:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >>Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > >>>OK, so we can either use 4 hex digits minimum and have a fixed with on > >>>most platforms, extend it to 8 hex digits, or revert the entire > >>>fixed-width idea. > >>I think we should lose the idea that it's fixed-width. 16-bit PIDs are > >>a limitation whose days are obviously numbered. > > > > > >I'm late to this party - I must have been asleep at the wheel back in > >October, but I guess I have an interest as the original author of > >log_line_prefix ;-) > > > >I can't off the top of my head see any good reason for zero padding, so > >I'm with Tom. > > Agreed. What might be useful, is a general padding feature in > log_line_prefix, like in sprintf: > > log_line_prefix = '%.5p '
Yes, I can see that as useful, especially for things like username and database name. TODO item? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
