On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 03:49:14PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Oh, I see. Have we historically been OK with these as long as it is > > clear it is the PG copyright? I know we had do some cleanups in the > > past, but I don't remember the details, obviously. > > We've had request from companies because they wanted to distribute > Postgres and lawyers weren't comfortable with copyright statements in > assorted files. In those cases we've asked the people mentioned in such > copyright statements, got approval to remove the offending copyright > lines, and removed them.
OK, so it was different _licenses_ that was the problem. OK. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
