On 06/07/2013 04:54 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > I mean, we don't necessarily need to make it configurable if we just add > one canonical new "better" compression format. I am not sure that's > sufficient since I can see usecases for 'very fast but not too well > compressed' and 'very well compressed but slow', but I am personally not > really interested in the second case, so ... As DE-comression is often still fast for slow-but-good compression, the obvious use case for 2nd is read-mostly data > > Greetings, > > Andres Freund >
-- Hannu Krosing PostgreSQL Consultant Performance, Scalability and High Availability 2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
