Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2013-06-07 11:46:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> IME, once we've changed it once, the odds that we'll want to change it
>> again go up drastically. I think if we're going to make a change here
>> we should leave room for future revisions.
> The above bit was just about how much control we give the user over the
> compression algorithm used for compressing new data. If we just add one
> method atm which we think is just about always better than pglz there's
> not much need to provide the tunables already.
Ah, ok, I thought you were talking about storage-format decisions not
about whether to expose a tunable setting.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
