MauMau escribió: > From: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com>
> One concern is that umount would fail in such a situation because > postgres has some open files on the filesystem, which is on the > shared disk in case of traditional HA cluster. See my reply to Noah. If postmaster stays around, would this be any different? I don't think so. > >IIRC the only other interesting tweak I did was rename the > >SignalAllChildren() function to TerminateChildren(). I did this because > >it doesn't really signal all children; syslogger and dead_end backends > >are kept around. So the original name was a bit misleading. And we > >couldn't really name it SignalAlmostAllChildren(), could we .. > > I see. thank you. Actually, in further testing I noticed that the fast-path you introduced in BackendCleanup (or was it HandleChildCrash?) in the immediate shutdown case caused postmaster to fail to clean up properly after sending the SIGKILL signal, so I had to remove that as well. Was there any reason for that? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
