On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> wrote: > I agree though, that having an index implementation that can do the > first level split faster than any partitioning mechanism can do is > better, and that the main benefits of partitioning are in > administration, *not* searching.
Indeed, but the proposal for hash partitions isn't fundamentally different from range partitions. It's "easy-to-use partitions over user-defined functions", hash or not. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
