On 07/08/2013 10:11 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 06/23/2013 09:43 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: >> (Cc: to pgsql-performance dropped, pgsql-hackers added.) >> >> At 2013-05-06 09:14:01 +0100, si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: >>> >>> New version of patch attached which fixes a few bugs. >> >> I read the patch, but only skimmed the earlier discussion about it. In >> isolation, I can say that the patch applies cleanly and looks sensible >> for what it does (i.e., cache pgprocno to speed up repeated calls to >> TransactionIdIsInProgress(somexid)). >> >> In that sense, it's ready for committer, but I don't know if there's a >> better/more complete/etc. way to address the original problem. > > Has this patch had performance testing? Because of the list crossover I > don't have any information on that.
Due to the apparent lack of performance testing, I'm setting this back to "needs review". -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
