On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <a...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > At 2013-07-10 09:47:34 -0700, j...@agliodbs.com wrote: >> >> Due to the apparent lack of performance testing, I'm setting this back >> to "needs review". > > The original submission (i.e. the message linked from the CF page) > includes test results that showed a clear performance improvement.
I think the reviewer of a performance patch should do some independent testing of the performance, to replicate the author's numbers; and hopefully with a few different scenarios. Cheers, Jeff -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
