On 07/04/2013 06:11 AM, Cédric Villemain wrote: > Le mercredi 3 juillet 2013 23:56:42, Josh Berkus a écrit : >> Peter, Cedric, etc.: >> >> Where are we on this patch? Seems like discussion died out. Should it >> be bounced? > > I for myself have been presuaded that it is a good idea. Things apparently > loosed are not, it just outline that we need better coverage in PGXS area, so > it is another thing to consider (TODO : add resgress test for PGXS ...) >
To be more focused: is this patch going to be committed in the next 4 days or not? If not, it's time to mark it "returned" so we can have leisurely spec argument later. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
