On 07/10/2013 09:04 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 07/04/2013 06:11 AM, Cédric Villemain wrote:
Le mercredi 3 juillet 2013 23:56:42, Josh Berkus a écrit :
Peter, Cedric, etc.:
Where are we on this patch? Seems like discussion died out. Should it
be bounced?
I for myself have been presuaded that it is a good idea. Things apparently
loosed are not, it just outline that we need better coverage in PGXS area, so
it is another thing to consider (TODO : add resgress test for PGXS ...)
To be more focused: is this patch going to be committed in the next 4
days or not? If not, it's time to mark it "returned" so we can have
leisurely spec argument later.
I think that would probably be the better course. I'm not sure there is
a consensus about this.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
