On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Pavel Stehule <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yes, what I know almost all use utf8 without problems. Long time I didn't >> see any request for multi encoding support. > > Well, not *everything* can be represented as UTF-8; I think this is > particularly an issue with Asian languages.
What cannot be represented as UTF-8? UTF-8 can represent every character in the Unicode character set, whereas UTF-16 can encode characters 0 to 0x10FFFF. Does support for alternative multi-byte encodings have something to do with the Han unification controversy? I don't know terribly much about this, so apologies if that's just wrong. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
