Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: > Agreed. Too bad you can't do this as an extension, it would allow you > to rev releases a lot faster than once a year.
> Actually, maybe you should look at "what is the minimum patch required > to enable a webserver extension", with the idea that most of the > webserver code would still live outside the core? That way you could > continue to develop it a lot faster. +1. I think for reasons such as security, a lot of people would rather *not* see any such thing in core anyway, independent of development issues. It's also far from clear that there is only one desirable behavior of this sort, so a design path that offers the possibility of multiple webserver implementations as separate extensions seems attractive. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers