On 08/13/2013 09:57 AM, Jeff Janes wrote: > Is this a blocker for 9.3? Why would it be? This issue doesn't originate with 9.3.
> If it is a concern of not what is deleted but rather that someone can > inject a poisoned stats file into the directory, does it need to be > back-patched all the way, as that could be done before the split > patch? I'd say it's a backpatch. We'll need to warn the heck out of users, though. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
