On Aug 20, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When you would to ignore result, then you should to use a PERFORM - actually, > it is limited now and should be fixed. Have no problem with it. Glad to have you on board. :-) > I don't would to enable a free unbound statement that returns result. I have no pony in that race. I think it is useful, though I prefer to unit test things enough that I would be fine without it. But even without it, there may be times when I want to discard a result in a function that *does* return a value -- likely a different value. So there needs to be a way to distinguish statements that should return a value and those that do not. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
