On 09/06/2013 07:57 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: >> But I wonder if we could just declare that that's not what the scale typmod >> does. That it's just a maximum scale but it's perfectly valid for NUMERIC >> data with lower scales to be stored in a column than the typmod says. In a >> way the current behaviour is like bpchar but it would be nice if it was more >> like varchar > Sure, but the point is that 5.0000 is not the same as 5.000 today. If > you start whacking this around you'll be changing that behavior, I > think. > So we already get it wrong by rewriting ?
-- Hannu Krosing PostgreSQL Consultant Performance, Scalability and High Availability 2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
