On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: > > > But I wonder if we could just declare that that's not what the scale typmod > does. That it's just a maximum scale but it's perfectly valid for NUMERIC > data with lower scales to be stored in a column than the typmod says. In a > way the current behaviour is like bpchar but it would be nice if it was more > like varchar
I agree that this makes more sense than what is currently done. But are we going to break backwards compatibility to achieve it? Do the standards specify a behavior here? Cheers, Jeff -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
