> > The count approach seems definitely the right way, but a check (possibly > > a slow one) can be probably done without initdb. > > We can certainly do the proper fix in 7.4; do we consider this bug > important enough to do an initdb for 7.3beta2? I don't have a strong > feeling either way about that.
I think we are too scared of doing initdb during beta... Initdb during beta should not be evaultated on a per bug basis, but keep a list of all things that could be fixed and judge if the total of all the fixes is worth one initdb. Right now off the top of my head I can think of the split function and this inherited change, are there more? my two cents... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
