On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, scott.marlowe wrote: > Agreed. > > Actually, an argument could likely be made that changes that require > initdb should be done as early as possible since the later the change the > more people there will be to test the change, and there will be fewer > people who actually have to initdb since a lot of folks don't test beta > releases until the 3rd or 4th beta.
My mental dyslexia strikes again, that should be: ... since the EARLIER the change the more people there will be to test the change, ... sheesh. Sorry... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
