On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > The existence of a tool like > pg_receivellog seems to presuppose that the goal is spit out logical > change records as text, but I'm not sure that's actually going to be a > very common thing to want to do...
Sure, but I think it's still worth having, for debugging purposes and so on. Perhaps the incorrect presupposition is that it deserves to live in /bin and not /contrib. Also, even though the tool is derivative of pg_receivexlog, its reason for existing is sufficiently different that maybe it deserves an entirely distinct name. On the other hand, precisely because it's derivative of receivelog/pg_receivexlog, it kind of makes sense to group them together like that. So I don't know. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
