On 2013-09-23 13:47:05 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Andres Freund escribió: > > On 2013-09-20 14:15:23 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > > > I have a little bit of feedback that I forgot to mention in my earlier > > > reviews, because I thought it was too trivial then: something about > > > the name pg_receivellog annoys me in a way that the name > > > pg_receivexlog does not. Specifically, it looks like someone meant to > > > type pg_receivelog but fat-fingered it. > > > > Yes, you're not the first to dislike it (including me). > > > > pg_receivelogical? Protest now or forever hold your peace. > > I had proposed pg_recvlogical
I still find it wierd/inconsistent to have: * pg_receivexlog * pg_recvlogical binaries, even from the same source directory. Why once "pg_recv" and once "pg_receive"? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
