On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:27 PM, KONDO Mitsumasa
<kondo.mitsum...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Hi Fujii-san,
>
>
> (2013/09/30 12:49), Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On second thought, the patch could compress WAL very much because I used
>> pgbench.
>>
>> I will do the same measurement by using another benchmark.
>
> If you hope, I can test this patch in DBT-2 benchmark in end of this week.
> I will use under following test server.
>
> * Test server
>   Server: HP Proliant DL360 G7
>   CPU:    Xeon E5640 2.66GHz (1P/4C)
>   Memory: 18GB(PC3-10600R-9)
>   Disk:   146GB(15k)*4 RAID1+0
>   RAID controller: P410i/256MB

Yep, please! It's really helpful!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to