On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 05:04:56PM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote: > > Patch (2): Make --initialize mode respect --progress. > >Rejected > > I missed this one...
See the second half of this message, including quoted material: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZNXkm-EtszHX=kwq34h5ni4cs8dg31no86cmdryaq...@mail.gmail.com > > Patch (5): Take thread start time at the beginning of the thread. > >Returned with Feedback > > Hmmm. I fought back on the feedback:-) I thought my arguments where > good enough to consider an accept. Here is the feedback in question: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20130930223621.ga125...@tornado.leadboat.com With or without the patch, reported performance figures are uninformative when thread start time is substantial relative to benchmark duration. A mere time accounting change will not help much; improving this requires tighter synchronization around the start of actual query activity across threads. I didn't read anything in your response as disagreement with that conclusion. nm -- Noah Misch EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
