On 2013-10-08 15:07:02 +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote: > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada.m...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I attached the v12 patch which have modified based on above suggestions. > > > > There are still some parts of this design/patch which I am concerned about. > > 1. The design clubs synchronous standby and failback safe standby rather > very tightly. IIRC this is based on the feedback you received early, so my > apologies for raising it again so late.
It is my impression that there still are several people having pretty fundamental doubts about this approach in general. From what I remember neither Heikki, Simon, Tom nor me were really convinced about this approach. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
