On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com>wrote:
> > I don't think that'd be a good idea - the "caughtup" logic is used to > determine whether we need to wait for further wal to be generated > locally if we haven't got anything else to do. And we only need to do so > when we reached the end of the WAL. > > Obviously I do not understand the logic caughtup fully, but don't you think the log message about standby having caught up with master while it hasn't because the sender has buffered a lot of data, is wrong ? Or are you saying those are two different things really ? > Also, we'd have to reset caughtup everytime we send data (in > XLogSend()), that'd be horrible. > > Sorry, I did not get that. I was only arguing that the log message about standby having caught up with master should be delayed until standby has actually received the WAL, not much about the actual implementation. Thanks, Pavan -- Pavan Deolasee http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee
