Splitting a B-tree page is a two-stage process: First, the page is split, and then a downlink for the new right page is inserted into the parent (which might recurse to split the parent page, too). What happens if inserting the downlink fails for some reason? I tried that out, and it turns out that it's not nice.

I used this to cause a failure:

--- a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c
@@ -1669,6 +1669,8 @@ _bt_insert_parent(Relation rel,
                        _bt_relbuf(rel, pbuf);
                }

+               elog(ERROR, "fail!");
+
                /* get high key from left page == lowest key on new right page 
*/
                ritem = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(page,
                                                                                
 PageGetItemId(page, P_HIKEY));

postgres=# create table foo (i int4 primary key);
CREATE TABLE
postgres=# insert into foo select generate_series(1, 10000);
ERROR:  fail!

That's not surprising. But when I removed that elog again and restarted the server, I still can't insert. The index is permanently broken:

postgres=# insert into foo select generate_series(1, 10000);
ERROR:  failed to re-find parent key in index "foo_pkey" for split pages 4/5

In real life, you would get a failure like this e.g if you run out of memory or disk space while inserting the downlink to the parent. Although rare in practice, it's no fun if it happens.

I fixed the the same problem in GiST a few years back, by making it tolerate missing downlinks, and inserting them lazily. The B-tree code tolerates them already on scans, but gets confused on insertion, as seen above. I propose that we use the same approach I used with GiST, and add a flag to the page header to indicate "the downlink hasn't been inserted yet". When insertion (or vacuum) bumps into a flagged page, it can finish the incomplete action by inserting the downlink.

- Heikki


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to