Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> writes: > However I think that part of this interesting checklist and discussion > could make it to some "caveat" section about reproducible performance > measures in pgbench documentation, though?
+1. There's already a section of advice about how to get reproducible numbers from pgbench --- we could certainly extend that to cover more things. BTW, even if we were going to put code for these things into pgbench, driving them all off a single switch would be very bad design. I see no reason to think that all and only these issues would be appropriate to control for any particular user of pgbench. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers