On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 18:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Perhaps, if we're worried about people keeping perl somewhere other > than /usr/bin. However, the most likely reason for having a > /usr/local/bin/perl or whatever is that it's a newer and shinier one > than what's in /usr/bin. Since we're only interested in bog-standard > perl, there's no real reason for us to want to pick up the local one.
After the Perl version of duplicate_oids was committed, some non-Windows build farm member failed because it didn't have perl in /usr/bin. So that appears to be a real issue. > The particular application to this case might be: what makes > you so sure env is in /bin? I don't have a /bin/env, but the normal invocation is /usr/bin/env anyway. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
